
I have been struggling with 2 diametrically opposed ideas, both of which make compelling arguments. I'm talking about the seemingly endless debate of creation versus evolution.
For as long as human kind has existed as humans, (and possibly before even that), there has been religion. When people don't have God, they invent gods to fill the vacuum. It seems that within the hearts of the vast majority of people living on this planet, there is the need to believe in a higher power. The need to believe that we're not just here by accident and not just a fluke result of natural forces.
On the other hand, the evidence that has been found to support the theory of life evolving from lower forms, and then advancing by a process of natural selection is overwhelming. There is so much confirmation of Mr. Darwin's theory that it really can't be called a theory. It's a proven fact.
So what about faith?
If you take the bible literally, that we were made from sand, and that everything was fine in the garden until the talking snake convinced Eve to take a bite of an apple, then it sounds too much like a fairy tale. Oh, and my favorite, "the lion laid with the lamb". Yeah, I can just see that. It's obviously just symbolism. The guy who wrote the book of Genesis wasn't even there. He was born thousands of years later.
You see, this guy named Moses wandered off into the Sinai desert for 40 days and 40 nights with no provisions, and then he saw a burning bush that talked to him and told him all the secrets of creation. Christianity's entire story of creation is based on what he wrote about what the burning bush told him. If I were to wander off into the Arizona desert without food or water, I bet after a while the bushes would start talking to me too. That wouldn't make it the Gospel truth, would it?
I really don't think you can take the bible literally. It was written by people from a much more primitive time about something that they really didn't understand. We don't even understand it now, so what chance would Moses have, or Mark, or Luke, or any of the several dozen authors of the bible? It's an interesting bit of theology, but it's not a true historical document.
I'm not saying it's all lies. I believe the people who wrote it believed their words to be true, but only as they perceived things. None of them were present when God created the world, or even when he created human kind, so they don't have a clue how he did, except for that famous conversation with a "burning bush".
So here's my own personal theory. I believe that God created man, and evolution is the means by which He did it. Evolution is not an accident. We exist because we were intended to exist. God didn't create religion, people did. God really doesn't care what religion you belong to. He judges you by the goodness that is in your heart. We, alone of all the creatures on this world, have a definite understanding of right and wrong, good and evil, and how we choose will determine our fate.
I hope my views don't offend anyone, but it's the only thing that makes sense to me. Religion is just a mordern age mythology.